Web Application Penetration Testing

Manual, exploit-driven testing of your web application โ€” the way a real attacker would approach it, with a report your developers can act on.

Why this matters: Broken access control and injection still sit at the top of the OWASP Top 10 because scanners keep missing them. Our published CVE case studies โ€” a password-reset flaw that enabled full Keycloak account takeover, an authentication bypass in cPanel โ€” show the pattern: one weak trust boundary equals full compromise. That is what manual testing exists to find.

What we cover

  • Authentication, session management, and password/token lifetimes
  • Authorization: IDOR, BOLA, privilege escalation, tenant isolation
  • Injection: SQLi, XSS, SSTI, template and deserialization abuse
  • REST and GraphQL APIs: rate limits, mass assignment, error leakage
  • Business logic: payment flows, coupons, quotas, workflow abuse
  • File upload, path traversal, and unsafe redirects
  • Security misconfiguration and known-vulnerable dependency versions

How we test

1Threat model & scope

We map entry points, user roles, and data flows first โ€” testing follows how your application is actually built, not a generic checklist.

2Manual deep-dive

Automated recon triages the surface; humans do the testing. Every reported finding is manually verified โ€” no scanner noise, no false positives.

3Safe exploitation

We prove impact with controlled, reversible exploits so severity is grounded in demonstrated risk, not theory.

4Report & retest

Executive summary, full technical detail with proof-of-concept steps, remediation guidance, and a retest of everything you fix.

What you get

  • Executive summary mapped to business risk
  • Technical report: PoC steps, CVSS severity, evidence
  • Developer-ready remediation guidance per finding
  • Findings-walkthrough call and a free retest window

The engagement at a glance

๐Ÿ“ž Free scoping call

A short conversation about your environment. You receive a written scope, timeline, and fixed quote โ€” no obligation.

โœ๏ธ Signed authorization

Testing begins only with your written permission and agreed rules of engagement. Always.

โฑ๏ธ Time-boxed delivery

A calendar agreed before we start, with an agreed communication plan while testing runs.

๐Ÿ” Retest included

A verification pass over everything you fix โ€” included in the price, not an add-on.

See the full engagement process โ†’ and how pricing is scoped in our public pricing guide.

Related research from Hmmnm

Common questions

What is the difference between black, grey, and white box testing?

Black box means we start with no credentials โ€” closest to an outside attacker. Grey box adds a normal user account, which suits testing authorization flaws. White box includes source or config access for the deepest coverage. We recommend the depth in the scoping call based on your goals.

How long does a web application test take?

A focused application typically one to two weeks end to end including the report. Larger platforms, multi-tenant SaaS, or additional APIs extend the calendar โ€” agreed in writing before we start.

Do you test in production or staging?

Either, with your written authorization and rules of engagement. Staging close to production is ideal; when production is the only option, we test carefully within agreed windows and safe techniques.

Authorization first, always. Testing happens only with your written permission and agreed rules of engagement โ€” the same ethics that govern responsible disclosure on this site.

Want this assessed for your environment?

A short scoping conversation is enough to get a fixed quote. No obligation โ€” a researcher replies.

Start the conversation โ†’