Security Maturity Check
Where your security program actually stands, what “good” looks like for your size, and the shortest path from here to there.
What we cover
- Control coverage scored across identity, data, network, and response
- Benchmarking against realistic peers — not enterprise fantasy
- Gap analysis with business-risk context
- Quick wins vs. structural investments, clearly separated
- Budget-aware roadmap sequencing
- Re-check to measure progress over time
How we test
Structured conversations with your team plus a review of key controls — no month-long audit.
Each area scored with reasoning you can challenge, not a black-box number.
Gaps ranked by real risk and effort, so sequencing is obvious.
A written plan: what to do now, next, and later — with cost ranges.
What you get
- Maturity scorecard across all core domains
- Honest gap analysis in business terms
- Budget-aware prioritized roadmap
- Optional re-check to show progress
The engagement at a glance
A short conversation about your environment. You receive a written scope, timeline, and fixed quote — no obligation.
Testing begins only with your written permission and agreed rules of engagement. Always.
A calendar agreed before we start, with an agreed communication plan while testing runs.
A verification pass over everything you fix — included in the price, not an add-on.
See the full engagement process → and how pricing is scoped in our public pricing guide.
Related research from Hmmnm
Common questions
Is this a compliance audit?
No — it is a practical assessment of whether your security actually works for your size. Compliance readiness is a separate service; many do both.
How long does it take?
One to two weeks including interviews and the written report.
Will it end with a giant shopping list?
No. The roadmap starts with configuration and process fixes that cost little — tool spend only appears where it genuinely earns its place.
Want this assessed for your environment?
A short scoping conversation is enough to get a fixed quote. No obligation — a researcher replies.
Start the conversation →