Attack Surface Review

Everything your organization exposes to the internet β€” mapped, ranked, and explained. Most companies are surprised by their own list.

Why this matters: Attackers do not attack your company; they attack what your company forgot about. The old panel nobody decommissioned, the staging server with production data, the CI key leaked in a public repository β€” our research series tracks how single forgotten assets became full breaches. This review finds yours before someone else does.

What we cover

  • Domain and subdomain enumeration β€” including forgotten projects
  • Exposed services, admin panels, and management interfaces
  • Cloud storage and bucket exposure review
  • Leaked secrets and keys in public repositories
  • Third-party services and SaaS your org exposes
  • Risk-ranked inventory you can act on

How we test

1External enumeration

OSINT and scanning from the outside β€” exactly the view an attacker has, no insider access needed.

2Validation

Each finding verified by hand: what is actually exposed, what version, what data.

3Risk ranking

Ranked by real exploitability and business impact, not scanner severity.

4Action plan

A short, sequenced takedown and hardening list.

What you get

  • Complete external asset inventory
  • Risk-ranked exposure report
  • Sequenced remediation plan
  • Optional re-scan cadence to keep it current

The engagement at a glance

πŸ“ž Free scoping call

A short conversation about your environment. You receive a written scope, timeline, and fixed quote β€” no obligation.

✍️ Signed authorization

Testing begins only with your written permission and agreed rules of engagement. Always.

⏱️ Time-boxed delivery

A calendar agreed before we start, with an agreed communication plan while testing runs.

πŸ” Retest included

A verification pass over everything you fix β€” included in the price, not an add-on.

See the full engagement process β†’ and how pricing is scoped in our public pricing guide.

Related research from Hmmnm

Common questions

Do you need any access to do this?

No β€” that is the point. Everything in this review is visible from the outside, exactly as an attacker sees it.

Is this a one-time thing?

The first review establishes your baseline; attack surfaces drift, so most clients re-scan quarterly or after major changes.

How is this different from a vulnerability scan?

A scan checks known hosts for known CVEs. This first answers β€œwhat exists at all?” β€” the forgotten assets scans never see β€” then validates and ranks what matters.

Authorization first, always. Testing happens only with your written permission and agreed rules of engagement β€” the same ethics that govern responsible disclosure on this site.

Want this assessed for your environment?

A short scoping conversation is enough to get a fixed quote. No obligation β€” a researcher replies.

Start the conversation β†’